show phone number write email open contact form
Johner Institut – Member of GBA Group
Problem Process Services Compare Pricing Contact FAQ Introductory Call
Performance evaluation · IVDR

Performance evaluation under IVDRon a predictable timeline – reliably compliant.

For IVD manufacturers: We build your performance evaluation under IVDR across its three pillars – scientific validity, analytical performance and clinical performance – through to an audit-proof performance evaluation file. The foundation is a robust state of the art, from which we derive your product-specific strategy, and hundreds of completed projects.

Book an Introductory Call → Per IVDR Art. 56 & Annex XIII
Robust state of the art as the basis 99.9% success rate Quote within 48 hours of the introductory call
Work on performance evaluation documents at the Johner Institut, the institute's website on screen behind. Robust state of the art Three pillars evidenced Notified Body ready
✓ 99.9% success rate ✓ Hundreds of completed projects ✓ All three pillars evidenced ✓ Experience with Notified Bodies
The foundation

The Three Pillars of Performance Evaluation

The IVDR requires evidence across three pillars. We build all three robustly – on the basis of a solid state of the art.

Pillar 1 · IVDR Art. 2(38)

Scientific Validity

The analyte is demonstrably linked to the clinical or physiological state – evidenced through the state of the art and literature.

Pillar 2 · IVDR Art. 2(40)

Analytical Performance

Your IVD correctly and reliably detects or measures the analyte – demonstrated through the applicable analytical performance characteristics.

Pillar 3 · IVDR Art. 2(41)

Clinical Performance

The test results correlate with the targeted clinical state – evidenced through clinical performance studies.

The problem

An incomplete performance evaluation can stop your market launch.

The IVDR sets out clear requirements for performance evaluation in Annex XIII – complemented by the MDCG guidance. What remains demanding is the product-specific interpretation and the performance evaluation strategy: it is rarely black and white – there is always room for interpretation. This is exactly where we come in – with a robust state of the art and a solid scientific validity as the basis for an objectively justified strategy with a sound chain of argument. If the file is incomplete, the Notified Body often does not even begin the review of the technical documentation.

State of the art as the foundation: Researching and documenting the state of the art – medical/diagnostic and technological – is the essential basis. It determines the effort for all further activities.
Three items of evidence, one triangle: Scientific validity, analytical and clinical performance – each pillar needs its own plans, data and reports.
Studies & statistics: Study design, sample-size planning, reference methods and confounders are demanding – and a frequent reason for rework.
Completeness is decisive: If you submit an incomplete performance evaluation, the Notified Body often does not even take up the review of the technical documentation.
The result? Every month of delay costs revenue, ties up internal resources and puts your IVDR deadlines at risk.
Evaluation of analytical data at a laboratory workstation.
The cost of waiting

What an Inadequate Performance Evaluation Really Costs

Months of Delay

Queries and rework from the Notified Body drag out your conformity assessment procedure.

Studies That Do Not Count

A performance study without a valid design or sample-size planning may have to be repeated – and paid for twice.

Lost Revenue

As long as your IVD is not on the market, your competitors earn – not you.

The Review Does Not Start

If you submit an incomplete performance evaluation, the Notified Body often does not even take up the review of the technical documentation.

Against these costs, a performance evaluation built robustly from the outset is a calculable investment – based on a robust state of the art and an objectively justified strategy.

The solution

There Is Another Way

What if experts built your performance evaluation from the outset the way the IVDR (Annex XIII) and your Notified Body measure it – across all three pillars, instead of defending it against queries afterwards?

Experts who develop a robust state of the art and the scientific validity and build on it a product-specific strategy with objective justification and a clear line of reasoning – with hundreds of completed projects and a 99.9% success rate?

That is exactly what our service for the performance evaluation of IVDs under IVDR is for.

How it works

Your Path in Four Steps

A clear, predictable process – aligned with the logic of the IVDR (Annex XIII) and the review practice of the Notified Bodies.

1

Analyze

We gain an overview of your IVD, your data and documentation and compare them – partly on a sampling basis – against the IVDR and the state of the art.

2

State of the Art & Performance Evaluation Plan

We produce or review the state-of-the-art report as the strategic basis and develop from it your Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) incl. a product-specific strategy with objective justification.

3

Build the Evidence

We support the planning and reporting of analytical and clinical performance (including per CLSI) – conducting the studies is up to you. Finally, we consolidate everything in the Performance Evaluation Report (PER).

4

Secure & Submit

We ensure completeness for the Notified Body review and keep your file continuously up to date via PMS and, if applicable, PMPF – given appropriate input and a data basis from your side.

Our services

What You Get

Comprehensive support for your IVD performance evaluation – from the state of the art through the strategy to a submission-ready file:

⚲

State of the Art (SOTA)

We research and document the state of the art – medical/diagnostic and technological. It is the strategic basis that determines the effort for all further activities. We take on the systematic literature search and the report.

Your benefit: A robust foundation for your entire performance evaluation strategy.

☰

Scientific Validity

We support the systematic literature search and the report evidencing scientific validity – or review your existing report for compliance.

Your benefit: The link between analyte and clinical condition – cleanly evidenced.

✎

Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP)

Based on the state of the art and scientific validity, we develop your product-specific strategy – with objective justification, a clear line of reasoning and a realistic weighing of effort and feasibility.

Your benefit: A viable strategy before study budgets are committed.

⚖

Analytical Performance

You provide the evidence for the applicable analytical performance parameters through studies. We help with the planning (including taking the CLSI requirements into account) and the reporting.

Your benefit: Studies that are validly planned and count the first time.

⚕

Clinical Performance

Depending on the state of the art and the strategy in the PEP, we support the planning of the clinical performance evidence – and broker a suitable CRO if needed.

Your benefit: The right route to the evidence – without unnecessary studies.

☑

Performance Evaluation Report (PER)

The PER summarizes all three pillars and demonstrates a positive benefit-risk ratio. We write, review and update it – submission-ready for the Notified Body.

Your benefit: Compliant, well-reasoned documents – that convince in audits and technical reviews.

↻

Post-Market Performance Follow-up (PMPF)

From the PMPF plan through collecting and evaluating the post-market data to the PMPF report – we keep your performance evaluation file continuously up to date and compliant.

Your benefit: Your file stays audit-proof – across the entire lifecycle.

Our service is right for you if …
✓You want to conserve resources and value a professionally prepared, up-to-date performance evaluation file.
✓You are facing the (initial) conformity assessment by a Notified Body and want to build all three items of evidence robustly.
✓You want a robust strategy and submission-ready documentation – without overloading your team.
Orientation

Develop it yourself or hand it over entirely?

There are three routes for the performance evaluation – depending on how much you want to do yourself. This page is for the last one: having it created in full.

Learn the basics

Seminar

You learn the principles of performance evaluation – in general and through examples, not on your product.

For whomGetting started and basic knowledge in the team.
ImplementationApplying it to your product stays entirely with you.
To the compact seminar →
Develop it yourself

Workshop

You develop the performance evaluation strategy for one specific IVD – yourself, with our expert, on your documentation. Including first study concepts.

For whomYou know the basics and want to apply them to your product.
ImplementationDetailed development and implementation stay with you – we provide the foundation and direction.
To the workshop →
Hand it over entirely · you are here

Have it created

We create your performance evaluation – from the state of the art through the strategy to a submission-ready file.

For whomYou want to hand over the work and conserve resources.
ImplementationWe take on research, strategy and reports. You carry out the performance studies yourselves; before and after, we help again with the documentation. Sign-off stays with you.
Book an Introductory Call →
Why this offer works

The Math Is Simple

Maximum benefit and maximum certainty – with minimal time and effort on your part.

Outcome
▲

Audit-Proof & Compliant

An audit-proof performance evaluation file that meets the IVDR requirements.

Probability
▲

99.9% Success

Hundreds of completed projects, deep experience with Notified Bodies.

Time required
▼

Predictable & Short

Performance evaluation in a short, predictable time – without surprises.

Your effort
▼

Noticeably Relieved

We deliver the research, strategy and reports – sign-off and responsibility stay with you.

Documents, a binder and Johner pens on a meeting table at the Johner Institut.
✓
Our promise

A Robustly Justified File – Sign-off Stays with You

We develop the state of the art and the scientific validity, derive from it a product-specific strategy with a clear, objective line of reasoning and document everything submission-ready. Sign-off and responsibility stay with you as the manufacturer – as the IVDR provides; we deliver the technically sound groundwork.

Your investment

A Transparent Quote – Tailored to Your IVD

An individual quote instead of a shot in the dark

Your Performance Evaluation under IVDR

Quote based on scope
A performance evaluation depends heavily on the IVD and your data situation – there is no flat fixed price for it. After the introductory call you receive your transparently calculated quote within 48 hours, reviewed under our four-eyes principle.
✓ State-of-the-art report (SOTA) as the strategic basis
✓ Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) & Performance Evaluation Report (PER)
✓ Evidence on scientific validity, analytical and clinical performance
✓ Systematic literature search with search protocol and report
✓ Binding schedule for the work based on your existing data & a dedicated contact
Book an Introductory Call →

We tailor your individual quote to your product and data situation in the free introductory call.

A clearly calculated quote – a fraction of what months of delay or an incomplete performance evaluation cost.

What You Get – At a Glance

✓ State of the art (SOTA)
✓ Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP)
✓ Performance Evaluation Report (PER)
✓ Scientific validity
✓ Analytical & clinical performance
✓ Systematic literature search
✓ Post-Market Performance Follow-up (PMPF)
✓ Quote within 48 hours of the introductory call
Proof

Why You Can Trust Us

Two Johner Institut specialists evaluating data on a laptop.
99.9%success rate
Hundredscompleted projects
3 pillarsfully evidenced
Annex XIIIbuilt IVDR-compliant
✓ Experienced team from IVD regulatory affairs, statistics and laboratory diagnostics
✓ Specialised in medical device regulation since 2004 – with experience of the review practice of Notified Bodies
✓ An objectively justified line of reasoning through to the submission-ready file

A Robust State of the Art, an Objectively Justified Strategy

We have completed hundreds of projects in IVD regulatory affairs. We develop the state of the art and the scientific validity and derive from it a product-specific strategy with a clear, objective line of reasoning – the basis for a file that withstands the Notified Body review. Sign-off and responsibility stay with you.

Customer feedback · Performance evaluation

“The collaboration with the Johner Institut was thoroughly professional, efficient and pleasant. In preparing the state-of-the-art report and the scientific validity, as well as documenting the test plans for the analytical performance studies, we received competent and reliable support. The structured approach, the scientific expertise and the practical recommendations convinced us. Many thanks for the excellent collaboration!”

— Customer, name withheld on request

⚠ Meet IVDR deadlines – avoid delays

Secure your compliance – before the deadline hits.

Have your performance evaluation built or revised by experts – based on a robust state of the art and an objectively justified strategy. Start with a no-obligation introductory call.

Book an Introductory Call →
30-minute call · quote within 48 hours

Your Introductory Call – No Obligation

In the call our experts get to know your product and capture the status of your data and documentation. Within 48 hours afterwards you receive your individual quote – reviewed under our four-eyes principle. No obligation, no effort for your team.

After the call

48 h to Your Individual Quote

Within 48 hours your quote is ready – reviewed under the four-eyes principle and transparently calculated based on scope.

After you engage us

Binding Timeline

For the creation of your performance evaluation based on the existing data we give you firm dates – instead of rough estimates. If evidence first has to be generated – such as a performance study – we clearly delimit that in the call.

Book an Introductory Call

We will get in touch shortly to schedule your introductory call.

Your data will be used solely to process your enquiry. Privacy Policy

FAQ

Answers before You Ask

Who is responsible for the performance evaluation?›
The responsibility and the sign-off stay with you as the manufacturer – as the IVDR provides. We deliver the technically sound groundwork: state of the art, scientific validity, product-specific strategy and reports – objectively justified and submission-ready.
What does a performance evaluation under IVDR involve?›
The IVDR understands it as the product-specific evidence of scientific validity, analytical performance and – where applicable – clinical performance (Article 2(44)). These three pillars are demonstrated via the Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP), studies and reports, and the Performance Evaluation Report (PER).
Do we always need clinical performance studies?›
Not necessarily. The required evidence of clinical performance is determined individually and traceably for each product. That is exactly why a well-founded assessment of the state of the art as the basis of argument is so important.
Can you revise an existing performance evaluation?›
Yes. We create performance evaluations from scratch or revise existing plans, reports and files so that they reliably meet the requirements of the IVDR.
What does my performance evaluation cost?›
We calculate your quote individually based on the complexity of your IVD and your data situation – a flat fixed-price statement would be unserious. After a short introductory call in which we get to know your product and capture the status of your data and documentation, you receive your quote within 48 hours – reviewed under our four-eyes principle.
How long does it take?›
On engaging us you receive a binding schedule for the work based on your existing data – no rough estimates, but firm dates. We set the scope based on your documentation in the introductory call. If evidence first has to be generated – such as a performance study – we consider that separately and delimit it clearly.
X

Privacy settings

We use cookies on our websites. Some of them are essential, while others help us to improve this website and your experience.